Colorado law provides that insurers owe a duty of good
faith and fair dealing to their insureds. The duty can
arise under first-party and third-party insurance contracts.
An insurer breaches this duty when it delays or denies
payment without having a reasonable basis for doing
so. Generally, insureds owe a similar duty to their
insurers.
Elements of Bad Faith Claim – Third Party Contracts
In order to recover on a bad faith claim, the plaintiff-insured
must prove that:
- He or she was injured or damaged;
- The insurer acted unreasonably;
- The insurer knew the conduct was unreasonable;
and
- The insurer’s unreasonable conduct caused
his or her injuries or damages.
An insurer engages in “unreasonable conduct”
when it fails to do something a reasonably careful person
would do or acts in a way a reasonably careful person
would not under the same or similar circumstances. Colorado
law presumes that certain claims unreasonable and thus
prohibits them by statute. Statutorily-prohibited claims
practices include the following:
- Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance
policy provisions relating to coverage;
- Failing to acknowledge and promptly respond
to communications regarding claims;
- Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards
for the prompt investigation of claims;
- Refusing to pay claims without conducting a
reasonable investigation;
- Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims
within a reasonable time after proof of loss statements
have been completed;
- Failing to attempt in good faith to effectuate
prompt, fair, and equitable settlement of claims where
liability is reasonably clear;
- Compelling insureds to institute litigation
to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by
offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately
recovered in such actions;
- Attempting to settle a claim for less than the
amount to which a reasonable person would have believed
he was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising
material accompanying an application;
- Attempting to settle claims on the basis of
an application which was altered without notice to,
or knowledge or consent of, the insured;
- Sending claim payments to insureds or their
beneficiaries without including a statement setting
forth the coverage;
- Informing insureds or claimants that it is the
insurer’s policy to appeal arbitration awards
in favor of insureds or claimants to compel them to
accept compromises;
- Delaying investigation or payment of claims
by requiring insureds to submit a preliminary claim
report followed by a formal proof of loss, both of which
request the same information;
- Failing to promptly settle claims under one
portion of the policy to influence settlements under
other portions of the policy;
- Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation
based on the policy, facts, or law for the insurer’s
denial of the claim;
- Raising comparative negligence as a defense
or reason for partial offset in the adjustment of a
third-party claim without conducting a reasonable investigation
and developing substantial evidence to support the defense.
The information you
obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be,
legal advice.
You should consult an attorney for individual advice
regarding your own situation.
Copyright © 2004 by Wood,
Ris & Hames, P.C. All rights reserved.
You may reproduce materials available at this site for
your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution.
All copies must include this copyright statement. |