wrh logo  
rule

spacer
Welcome
Attorneys
Practice Areas
Newsletters
Office Location
Legal Information
Clients
Disclaimer
Contact Us
spacer Wood, Ris & Hames, P.C.
1775 Sherman Street
Suite 1600
Denver, CO 80203-4313
Tel. (303) 863-7700
Fax. (303) 830-8772
image

image image
 
  bug      

Governmental Immunity

The Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (“GIA”) replaces the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity, which immunized the State of Colorado and its political subdivisions from suit for personal injuries suffered by private persons. The GIA controls all actions where the state, any of its political subdivisions, or public employees of public entities are sued in tort. The GIA controls all actions that lie in tort or could lie in tort regardless of the type of action or form of relief chosen by the plaintiff.

Under the GIA, public entities are immune from liability for all tort claims or claims that could lie in tort regardless of the action chosen by the claimant. However, this immunity is waived in actions for injuries resulting from the following:

  • The operation of a motor vehicle owned or leased by a public entity or employee while in the course of employment. However, this waiver does not apply to emergency vehicles.
  • The operation of any public hospital, correctional facility, or jail.
  • A dangerous condition of any public building.
  • A dangerous condition of a public highway, road, or street which physically interferes with the movement of traffic on the paved portion. “Physically interferes with the movement of traffic” does not include traffic signs, signals, or markings or the lack there of.
  • A dangerous condition caused by the failure to realign a stop sign or yield sign which was turned without authorization in a manner which reassigned the right of way or the failure to repair a traffic control signal on which conflicting directions are displayed.
  • A dangerous condition caused by an accumulation of snow and ice which physically interferes with public access on walks leading to a public building open for public business if the public entity failed to use existing means available to it to remove or mitigate such accumulation if the public entity had actual notice of the condition and a reasonable time to act.
  • A dangerous condition of any public hospital, jail, public facility located in any park or recreation area maintained by a public entity or a public water, gas, sanitation, electrical, power, or swimming facility.
  • The operation and maintenance of any public water facility, gas facility, sanitation facility, electrical facility, power facility, or swimming facility.
  • The waiver of sovereign immunity created by these exceptions does not apply to those incarcerated in a correctional facility or jail unless the claimants have not yet been convicted.
Even if one of the above-listed exceptions to the general doctrine of sovereign immunity is present, plaintiffs must still meet the GIA’s notice provision. The GIA’s notice provision requires persons who claim to have been injured by a public entity or by its employee acting in the scope and course of his or her employment must file a written notice within 180 days after the date on which the person discovered the injury, regardless of whether the person then knew all of the elements of claim or a cause of action for such injury. The notice requirement is a jurisdictional prerequisite to any action brought under the GIA, and a plaintiff’s failure to comply forever bars his or her action.

Under the GIA, the plaintiff’s notice must contain the following:

  • The name and address of the claimant and the name and address of his attorney, if any;
  • A concise statement of the factual basis of the claim, including the date, time, place, and circumstances of the act, omission, or event complained of;
  • The name and address of any public employee involved, if known;
  • A concise statement of the nature and extent of the injury claimed to have been suffered; and
  • A statement of the amount of monetary damages requested.

The GIA also specifies with whom the notice must be filed to be valid. If the claim is against the state or one of its employees, the notice must be filed with the attorney general. If the claim is against any other public entity or one of its employees, the notice must be filed with the public entity’s governing body or attorney.

Notice under the GIA is effective upon mailing by registered mail or upon personal service. If the claim is for wrongful death, the notice may be presented by the personal representative, surviving spouse, or next of kin of the deceased. This section does not alter Colorado’s general statutes of limitation. If notice is given pursuant to the GIA’s notice provision, no action shall be commenced until after the claimant has received notice from the public entity that the public entity has denied the claim or until after 90 days have passed following the filing of the notice of claim required by this section, whichever occurs first.

The GIA also sets the following limitations on the amount recoverable from public entities and employees:

  • For any injury to one person in any single occurrence: $150,000.
  • For an injury to two or more persons in any single occurrence: $600,000 with no one person allowed to recover in excess of $150,000.
The GIA defines “dangerous condition” as a physical condition of a facility or the use thereof which constitutes an unreasonable risk to the health or safety of the public, which is known to exists or which in the exercise of reasonable care should have been known to exist and which condition is proximately caused by the negligent act or omission of the public entity in constructing or maintaining such facility. Maintenance does not include any duty to upgrade, modernize, modify, or improve the design or construction of the facility. A dangerous condition should have been known to exist if it is established that the condition has existed for such a period of time and was of such a nature that, in the exercise of reasonable care, such condition and its dangerous character should have been discovered. A dangerous condition does not exist solely because the design of any facility was inadequate. The mere existence of wind, water, snow, ice, or temperature shall not, by itself, constitute a dangerous condition.
 

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Copyright © 2004 by Wood, Ris & Hames, P.C. All rights reserved.
You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution.
All copies must include this copyright statement.

image image image image image
 
image   image
image image
image